Since those doing the estate inventory were presumably copying from Hick's records, this is apparently what he wrote. So unless someone used this as a nickname, it looks like Hicks didn't actually expect to get his money back.
Saturday, June 7, 2014
Unlikely to Pay?
While going through the Crawford County probate records, I found this entry on the inventory of the estate of Daniel Hicks. His estate, one of the wealthiest in the county, showed a number of accounts owed to him, including this one:
Since those doing the estate inventory were presumably copying from Hick's records, this is apparently what he wrote. So unless someone used this as a nickname, it looks like Hicks didn't actually expect to get his money back.
Since those doing the estate inventory were presumably copying from Hick's records, this is apparently what he wrote. So unless someone used this as a nickname, it looks like Hicks didn't actually expect to get his money back.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment